If safe distance to live from cell phone tower 've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.
While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is crucial to know since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such safe distance from cell tower should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.