If what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. safe distance from cell tower can result in many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.
While what is a safe distance from a cell tower sounds like an ideal idea however, those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.