If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. safe distance to live from cell phone tower for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower could result in various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
While it sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.