Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  can result in various potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.

Although this may sound like a good idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).



This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.