If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
However, because safe distance to live from cell phone tower transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.
Although this may sound like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
https://www.pearltrees.com/olivebeaver7/item514958638 does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.