If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. safe distance to live from cell phone tower for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. what is a safe distance from a cell tower 's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. what is a safe distance from a cell tower of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.