If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can result in various potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.
While this sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body. safe distance from cell tower is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.